Should the Missouri Constitution be amended to change the definition of cloning and ban some of the research as approved by voters in November, 2006 by:
• prohibiting human cloning that is conducted by creating a human embryo at any stage from the one-cell stage forward;
• prohibiting expenditure of taxpayer dollars on research or experimentation on human cloning; and
• allowing stem cell research for therapies and cures that complies with these prohibitions and the prohibitions of Section 38(d) of theConstitution?
Thursday, February 21, 2008
New Ballot Summary
The following is the language that the judge handed down and is now certified to the Secretary of State:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Yea!!!!! There's no way it won't pass with this language. The only reason it passed last time was because of the deceiving language. Way to go!
Still have to get through the appellate courts, and when you look at who appointed those judges, it can't bring a smile to your lips. Deo gratias, we won this battle. Deo volente, we'll win the war.
Post a Comment